Subject:
|
Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 May 2004 19:41:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9899 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
> >
> > > It might be worth noting that this doesn't suggest that TLG will actually take
> > > AFOL input into consideration--merely that TLG won't make the change without
> > > AFOL input. The input might easily be ignored, but TLG can still claim to have
> > > accepted AFOL input...
> >
> > Wow. That's harsh.
>
> Heh.
>
> Well, what can I say? I tend to be an "on the dark side" kind of guy...
>
> Harsh, perhaps--but is my assessment inaccurate? Aside from the bottom line,
> corporations love nothing as much as preserving wiggle room.
I suppose, you could be right, but I think it misses the entire point of why we
would ask for feedback in the first place. Why would we even bother to ask if we
didn't think we would somehow use it? The point of us agreeing to include AFOLs
was to avoid another situation like we've had here.
Of course, that said, sure, we might not follow your feedback 100%. After all,
there's always multiple things to consider. If we'd listened only to AFOLs about
Bionicle, we'd have never moved forward with a much loved, incredibly cool
product.
Corporations are not big Matrix-like computers. Corporations are made up of
people. In fact, I'd guess that a huge percentage of people reading this now are
doing so from work at a "corporation". We're trying to do good things here
folks. There are real people behind the decisions and changes that are made. You
may not like them, you may not agree with them, some will fail and some will
succeed. But at the end of the day, the motivations are driven more by people
trying to do good. Good for the company, for the consumer, and for themselves.
Jake
---
Jake McKee
Community Liaison
LEGO Community Development
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| "Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:Hx9Aox.251s@lugnet.com... (...) themselves. Jake, then why can't we hear from TLC, the people driven company, why they thought reversing 20+ years of product design was "good." ? We (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
| | | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| (...) I should take a moment to thank you for your courtesy in addressing my concerns, since I flatter myself to think that you might know my MO here on LUGNET, so I'm hardly the biggest income source for TLG. Thank you. I don't mean to lay a big (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| (...) Heh. Well, what can I say? I tend to be an "on the dark side" kind of guy... Harsh, perhaps--but is my assessment inaccurate? Aside from the bottom line, corporations love nothing as much as preserving wiggle room. Dave! (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
260 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
