 | | Re: This is incredible! —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) Well, aside from the fact that you're fantasizing about the motivation or intent behind the placement of the LUGNET logo... Trademarks are a serious thing. If you don't vigorously protect your trademarks you risk losing them. Just because you (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) in (...) This is a good point. These days, within society as a whole, people are too concerned about staying within the law (often just within the law). I think one can be inside the law - but still be morally wrong. If "thinking people", as (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Agreed! I was wondering, though; does the Mania magazine have anything like a general Trademark disclaimer? I've read other magazines that say something like "individual trademarks are held by their respective owners, and their mention here (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Matthew Teets
|
| | | | | | (...) I haven't seen one, but I don't think anyone would have recognized as needing a trademark or I don't think it would have appeared at all. I'm pretty sure most people at Lego didn't make the connection at all or even know our existence. I think (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Rich Manzo
|
| | | | (...) in (...) Thats right. They did ignore the online LEGO community for a very long time, but now thet are not. I good example of this is the fact that the LUGNET logo is in the Mania Magazine. (...) Yes that is the progress I am talking about. (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) I guess if that's all it takes (for you) to have them make up for years of blowing us off, you must be pretty happy. (...) Does it? Exactly who in TLC/TLG contacted you to explain the purpose behind having that there. I gotta tell you, I'm (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Rich Manzo
|
| | | | (...) No, but I think it is a step in the right direction. (...) That is right I do not know. Neither do you. Lets wait and see what TLC's response is. (...) Well, I do care what the groups opinion is. It does not mean that Todd or Suz must accept (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is incredible! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Why? What does it matter what our opinion on this is? It's only tangentially related to the day to day operation of LUGNET, so let it go. ++Lar (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
