To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 16721
16720  |  16722
Subject: 
Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space
Date: 
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:00:24 GMT
Viewed: 
2723 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Bram Lambrecht writes:
Adrian Drake writes:
Bram, as well as Troy Cefaratti, both have the Coolpix 995,
and I have the Coolpix 4500 (which is basically the 995's
followup).  They're the split-body design, and I love my
camera dearly.  They are more mid-to top of the line than the
camera that you're eying, Aaron, so the featureset clearly
isn't the same. But when you're spending 3 times as much on
the thing, you'd expect a little more.

Actually, I have the 990, which is one model earlier than the 995.  Troy
is using a Canon EOS D10 these days

Well, whatever it is Troy is using, here is a picture of it as well as a
picture of how it pictures--

http://www.bricklink.com/memberCollage.asp?uID=807&lUID=M

Maggie C.



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
 
(...) Actually, I have the 990, which is one model earlier than the 995. Troy is using a Canon EOS D10 these days. I'm quite happy with all the features on my camera...manual/automatic focus, f-stop, shutter speed, white balance, flash, etc. The (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR