 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99 —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) Great, thanks! Ultimately, the means of communication should be up to the elected LSC members to decide for themselves. If I had my say, I like the idea of a mailing list on LDraw.org, which posts messages automatically to a LUGNET group for (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | mailing list linkage — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: mailing list linkage —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: mailing list linkage — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: mailing list linkage —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the existing scheme -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: mailing list linkage — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
