Subject:
|
Re: What's going to happen.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:14:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
220 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Paul Baulch writes:
>
> Firstly, thank you Matthew for apologising. I told you that it was the right
> thing to do. In future, please make an effort to moderate how you express
> your feelings, and if you do say something offhand, please be careful. You
> may not get a second chance to participate with us.
>
> Secondly, if I got my wish, Mike Stanley would have his posting privileges
> revoked until he learnt how to refrain from posting spiteful rubbish whose
> overall sentiment is frankly more poisonous, more hateful, than anything
> I've EVER seen on Lugnet. EVER.
>
> Thank you for making me angry, Mike Stanley. Angry and upset and most of
> all, very, very disappointed. Please go away for a while. Go away and learn
> what it truly means for Lugnet to be a friendly place, because you have made
> it plain that you do not know. Go out into the fresh air, go camping,
> fishing, go to church, talk with people for a few months and learn to
> forgive. You too, Selçuk. And you, John Robert-Blaze Kanehl, and anyone else
> who has forgotten how to be decent human beings. Go on. Now!
>
> Thanks for reading.
> Angry and disappointed,
Sorry about making you such dissapointed and angry, but please consider that
you are not the only one. Not mad at you of course, and not at any other people
who accepted his apologies. You just tried to make your point and I don't have
any problem with it.
You judged MM and decided the case to be dissmissed. And yes, I judged him too.
I read his web site, I read all the things he wrote here, and I read all the
things he wrote in the famous thread in RTL. And I judged him to be executed.
As you might already guessed (since I never replied any of the forgiving
people in a harch way), I don't have any problem with that. But I have a
problem with him, and I never had a problem with saying it so. So please
reconsider your saying once again, while blaming people, including me, as
"forgetten how to be decent human beings". The whole thing is not related with
being human or not (or may be completely related with that). Both of us judged
him, you decided that he is a lost soul seeking for salvation, I decided that
he is a large diameter *** ****. That's it. And believe me, I'm after my
decision, just as you. Maybe only difference is that, I'm not calling names for
who decided otherwise.
He was in RTL, he posted a project of him, and just after the first reply to
him (which is not worded badly) he started to puke disgust to others. Maybe you
didn't read it whole, and not a chance now since all of his messages were
somehow cancelled (evidence removal by himself?), but when I read them I really
amazed by his style, even to the posts trying to be kind and helpful, times
after times. Then, by his way of pathetic reasoning, he decided that Lego
community is an evil group of random flamers, and set up a long term revenge
(this is from his own words here at the recent thread). He striked a random
innocent just to start a flame war, beacuse he need some live evidence to make
his very "point". Add his pathetic web site (which is stil online) and
stopendous apologizing efforts (he still insited on he was trying to "help us
fools", he is still dare enough to say "if I want to destroy Lugnet, it will
not be here" while trying to explain he had no intention to destroy Lugnet),
then I get nothing but a large diameter *** **** as a final decision.
I really can't see the difference here. We have two very similar ceses. After
the first one, he planned more than a year long revenge, but after the second
one, just several hours after the second one, he saw he was wrong!! Sorry but I
don't buy it. The only difference that I can ever see between the two cases is
here is no usenet anymore, and someone can ban him from here.
I hope I made myself clear, because I don't like to be named as inhuman by the
fellow Lugneters whom I respected. And please condsider me with my whole
presence here, and believe this is a completely different case for me, as I
already mentioned several times before.
Robert already made himself clear I think, by wording his reasoning in his
first reply. For Mike, I should admit that he was somewhat bitter than needed,
I don't know if I would behave nicer to someone who is rediculing a person
disgustingly whom I know personally, respected as a friend, and passed away
long ago.
In brief I have own reasons for my desicion, and I don't want him here. And of
course I have no problem with any other people who want to be forgiving. Just
little upset about naming as inhuman
Regards,
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What's going to happen.
|
| Matthew wrote in message <39f06e60.3126733@ne...et.com>... (...) Firstly, thank you Matthew for apologising. I told you that it was the right thing to do. In future, please make an effort to moderate how you express your feelings, and if you do say (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
