 | | Re: the latest news Rating System —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | (...) Well, I get all my LUGNET content through the e-mail exchange, and I very rarely frequent the web interface. I don't see the ratings at all, and I really don't care all that much. Knowing the assualt I got in debate, it probably is better (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: the latest news Rating System —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Your not missing much. Just as a guide, the post below has been rated by 4 readers and has a score of 80 - which probably puts it in the top 10%. Enjoy: (URL)Knowing the assualt I got in debate, it (...) I think Todd said before that about 50% (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: the latest news Rating System —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) people marked it 100. Only thing I can figure is that they thought it might be helpful to raise its visibility. It's certainly not anything I'd call worthy of 100 in its own right. (For anyone following along but not clicking the URL, it's a (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: the latest news Rating System —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) other (...) might (...) clicking (...) I saw this post soon after it was posted and I rated it 100. It is rather an important post--not for me but for someone, namely the person who sent the payment. My (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
