To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: crimson+skies
 Results 41 – 45 of about 450.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

Subject: 
Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:13:01 GMT
Viewed: 
1632 times
  
In lugnet.space, Geordan Hankinson wrote:
   If he were trying to sell this design to lockheed, then I’d laugh too. But he’s not. He’s building it to make flying noises out of the right side of his mouth, and shooting noses out of the left as he makes a pass on his cat.

-Geordan

Shooting noses

:)

--Ryan W.

 

crimson, skies
(score: 1.286)

Subject: 
Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:40:36 GMT
Viewed: 
1645 times
  
   But, hey, my opinions are as good as farts in the wind.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha beats chaff doesn’t it.

I read your other reply to Jon and I see where you were coming from. No hard feelings, it just seemed like you were jumping on him or something, which you weren’t.

Sorry bout my jackalizing.

-Geordan

 

crimson, skies
(score: 1.286)

Subject: 
Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:22:45 GMT
Viewed: 
1563 times
  
In lugnet.space, Daniel Jassim wrote:
   For example, the bi-wing in the front creates a tremendous blind spot for both crewmen (I assume one is a pilot and the other is a navigator or bombardier?). Perhaps the top wing is for extra lift because of the huge gat in front? If so, it may be pointless since the top wing limits crucial visibility in air-to-air combat. I believe that’s one reason why bi-plane fighters were replaced by mono-planes in WWII.

I remember reading once that the tri-wing+ concept was scrapped when it was realized that it didn’t really provide any more lift potential than a bi-wing, but I suspect the switch from WWI bi-wings to WWII mono-wings had more to do with advances in wing-construction. The bi-wing wings were just frames with cloth strapped over the top, and no solid undersides. Mono-wing wings were fully-skinned with metal plating over a highly sculpted inner frame (and the advent of the jet engine made wing shape so much less important than it was in prop-driven planes that jet planes can fly upside-down for extended periods), and the advanced wing design simply rendered the bi-wing concept just as pointless as the tri-wing.

 

crimson, skies
(score: 1.286)

Subject: 
Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:57:00 GMT
Viewed: 
1795 times
  
In lugnet.space, John Henry Kruer wrote:

   NICE... how do you find things like that? :)

Careful. People who ask Jon that question tend to get dragged off by the nice men in black suits.

Soren

 

crimson, skies
(score: 1.286)

Subject: 
Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:07:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1544 times
  
In lugnet.space, Adrian Drake wrote:

   It took me a while to wrap my brain around the direction this thing flies, but once I figurd it out, I’m rather impressed.

I mourn for the loss of the stud, though. All this snot/studless building...

Adrian

http://www.brickfrenzy.com

Thanks Adrian! You should take some time off from the Trib and make a plane. That would be great.

The stud is dead. Long live the SNOT.


   [ j o n ]
zemi.net
moonbase

 

crimson, skies
(score: 1.285)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR