|
| | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| (...) I agree with your general impressions, except that ... (...) ... this is too high a price to pay for 3 (semi)useful pieces and some rubberbands. I don't count the SPUD/POOP chassis or the soft plastic slammer, because I don't feel they are (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
|
| So, what does 'Zooters' mean? Is it a licensed theme, known in the US? Eric (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| (...) I could nawwwwt believe my eyes when I saw how small those little buggers are. Although I am sooooo not in the target market, it was still disappointing to see. (...) Oh, that's what those ratings are for? OK, that kinda makes sense now. When (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| We have Surfer and Shredd. I was disappointed that the wheels are fixed, since I wanted to make and all-blue racer. My kids found the "slammer" action to be frustrating. It was too hard to actually launch two cars and hit each other. The driver (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| Bradley Dale <dinosauria_ca@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:G9CKIJ.7MF@lugnet.com... I too bought one of these at the weekend. I wasn't that impressed, but my daughter, in the target age range, liked it. (...) The 2x2 curved slope used on the front (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
| |