 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Victor Knight
|
| | | (...) What? I know he mentioned it with SW, but I don't remember him saying it abotu Castle, I thought people were merely speculating that. (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) I'm pretty sure he said it, because I remember being very unhappy about it. Jeff (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Stephen Rusnak
|
| | | | | | He did state that while LEGO has HP they will not be releasing castle, same as with SW, but I do not think that that precludes re-releasing old established sets in the Legend and Classic lines -- Overkill is the only sure kill. SR "Jeff Stembel" (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Victor Knight
|
| | | | | | (...) I thoguht all these licenses were stupid, but these "requirements" make them intolerable! (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) same (...) as (...) My impression was that they won't be releasing castle and Harry Potter at the same time was not a licensing issue, but an issue that they only want to support one theme in a general type, and since Harry Potter heavily (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |
