|
|
 | | Custom Models
|
| In the year 2002, Lego will offer custom order sets. In theory, this would allow one to recreate, say, BT1. Or, redo Lego sets that are considered to need work. I, for one look forward to it. (25 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
| | |  | | Re: This is scaring me...
|
| (...) Indeed. Assuming TLC solves the "license one person's design so others can order it" problem in a way that makes it attractive for designers to contribute, and in a way that makes it easy for consumers to find "the good stuff". Some people (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | |  | | Re: This is scaring me...
|
| Yeah, I think you've misunderstood just a bit. I personally think it's a great idea. Why? Well, to be honest I wouldn't use it myself, but I don't think it'll replace the new sets. Lego is looking to expand itself, not radically change suddenly. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | |  | | Re: This is scaring me...
|
| One thing to consider is to look what is happening to the 'e-business' companies such as Amazon.com and Etoys.com. They are not making any $$. This Christmas is the 'make or break' for them to actually turn a profit. I don't see e-commerce taking (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | |  | | Re: This is scaring me...
|
| (...) But think of this: there are people here who design way better technic models than Lego ever does. You could buy *those* as sets! (25 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | |  | | Re: This is scaring me...
|
| It isn't/won't. TLC will always design sets - heck, the have the SW license through 2007! The new software will be a supplement product, like Mosaic. As to the exact details of what it will contain, none of us know yet. Will it be a wide range of (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | |  | | This is scaring me...
|
| Most people love the idea of being able to design sets online and order them. I don't like it. I might try it, but I really hope that TLC continues to design sets to sell in stores. Here's why having all LEGO online would be bad-- - They would (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | |  | | Re: Harry Potter LEGO- what happened?
|
| (...) Well, actually, that's not really the secret ending. Won't say any more. Finish the books, and you'll see what I mean. (...) Yep, it'll be different. But maybe it won't be juniorized. (nah) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002)
| | |  | | Re: Harry Potter LEGO- what happened?
|
| Also, a main reason for the perhaps "targeted age bracket" of book>4 could have something to do with the fact there's a death of a boy, age 17, (...) Thanks for giving away the secret ending. Here I am in the middle of the third book, looking (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002)
| | |  | | Re: Harry Potter LEGO- what happened?
|
| (...) Well, actually, he was 10 (turning 11) in the first book and 14 in the fourth. Also, a main reason for the perhaps "targeted age bracket" of book 4 could have something to do with the fact there's a death of a boy, age 17, at the end. It'll be (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002)
| |