 | | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) Yep, I remember that as well. Guess all the critics that this was the thin edge of a wedge were right after all. (...) Completely agreed on the risk. What a crock. I think the Bob sets will be a failure (or passable success) for the simple (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 set list on FBTB!
|
|
(...) I should have took that bet... ;) -chris (24 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) Here's some more info I tracked down : (URL) in Humanacy -- how good does that sound!! --DaveL (24 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) What's wrong with that? A full-sized mini-figure torso has no alternate uses either. I really want a few of the new figures because 1) A new figure is for once smaller than mini-figures, sort of in-between "mini-fig" and "micro-fig" scale. I (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
|
|
(...) I wonder about that every time I see a zillion of those sets still setting on the shelves. Could it be that, in order to secure the Spielberg/LEGO Studios deal, it was necessary to license Jurassic Park III? Is there any way to find out? Dave! (24 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
