To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2001Open lugnet.year.2001 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2001 / 336
335  |  337
Subject: 
Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001
Date: 
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:18:13 GMT
Viewed: 
39 times
  
In lugnet.build.minifigs, Eric Kingsley writes:
In lugnet.build.minifigs, Kyle Keppler writes:
Hehe, I personaly like the battle droid "figs" but the legs would be ALOT
beter if they wern't attached together... Now the alien figs, that's another
story, LEGO could have done better.  I'd think they'd look rather robotic
with those BD parts, but I have no LOM sets yet so I can't be sure...

Just an FYI,  Only the torso and arms are Battle Droid parts.  The Legs are
actually more organic and bent at the knee.  The are still fuzed like the BD
lets though.

Well, thats good to hear, but why must they be fuzed! I guess the little
kiddies would break 'em... ;-)

</Kyle>

AIM: legomankyle or KyleKeppler
______________________________________________
High Velocity LEGO:                                   http://hvl.cjb.net
BrickLUG chat:                     http://hifiki.tripod.com/legochat
Keppler Industries:  http://people.atl.mediaone.net/kindustries


Eric Kingsley

The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
 
(...) Just an FYI, Only the torso and arms are Battle Droid parts. The Legs are actually more organic and bent at the knee. The are still fuzed like the BD lets though. Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR