Year 2001 : 335


Year / 2001 / 335	334 \| 336

Subject:	Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:02:02 GMT
Viewed:	35 times

In lugnet.build.minifigs, Tony Hafner writes: > Possible alternatives: > suckifigs > suckrofigs > manglefigs > uglyfigs > > Any others? Yeah. How about: Martians I actually have been meaning to post that after getting all the LoM sets (apart from the big base, which no one seems to have found yet) I quite like the martians, which surprises me, because frankly I expected to think they were awful. eric

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
(...) You miss the point. I am talking about a name for the whole class of figs, which would include martians, battle droids, and whatever else Lego comes out with in the future that uses this construction style. (...) I'm OK with the look of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

Message is in Reply To:

		Do we have a name for the new figs?
I can't imagine that this hasn't been discussed, but I don't see anything on it. Now that the battle droid bodies are being used for the martians, I expect that they are here to stay. Hence, we need a general name for the whole class of figures. I (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search