|
|
 | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
|
| (...) wow. It's true. (interesting to compare these two reports) (URL) trying a different Google search, I found this. I feel kinda dumb now. Info is a month old. But, well, it _is_ 4:30 a.m. here. My mind could be numb because I need sleep. -Suzzz (25 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
|
| I really don't know what's news here anymore, but after doing some LUGNET searches, I didn't see any sign of some unusual words in this report I have. This is from the toy retailer industry magazine, "The Toy Book," which reports on toy companies, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: AW MAN!
|
| (...) Then ask this guy: (URL) :^L~ (25 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: AW MAN!
|
| (...) Nope. Don't hate myself. Not over Jack Stone. Not even a little bit. (25 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: AW MAN!
|
| (...) Sigh... Why take Jack Stone to mean that its a bad thing for Town? Maybe this is actually a good thing. Many of us have taken Town Jr. to be TLC "transition" theme from Duplo to System, now Jack Stone is taking that niche. Maybe, just maybe, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.town)
|
|
