 | | Re: GMLTC layout 'show' pictures —John Gerlach
|
| | | (...) Nothing that complicated - we used our regular tables (40"x60"), Conan threw together some simple plywood boxes to get up to track height on each end of the layout. (16+ bricks on the low end, 24+ bricks on the high end.) We put a simple loop (...) (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: GMLTC layout 'show' pictures —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, you'd be recapitulating classic large MR layout control schemes. CTC works.... Consider DCC if you can afford it and skip having blocks. Of course, DCC isn't as pure of a solution, currently. (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: GMLTC layout 'show' pictures —Steve Barile
|
| | | | If the main lines are large enough you can manully do this. We often have a long "passing rail" (attached at both ends) off our mainlines. We setup two simularly weighted trains, so the go about the same speed, one on the mainline one on the passing (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Running multiple trains (was "GMLTC layout 'show' pictures") —John Gerlach
|
| | | | (...) Come on, Steve - I'm a computer programmer! What is the standard answer to every problem? "Write a program"!! <grin> I spent the last hour in a staff meeting trying to figure out how I can do this with RCXs... ;-) Don't know if I can make it (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
