Train Organizations : 1433


Trains / Train Organizations / 1433	1432 \| 1434

Subject:	Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001))
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2001 01:10:25 GMT
Viewed:	18 times

In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Michel Magnan writes: > ...The ["standard" LEGO train table] legs are very labor intensive, > and I still haven't finished the legs from the tables I made last year. > I believe that the PNLTC guys have eliminated the attachable legs, due > to the long set up time. If we could somehow use folding legs that would > save a lot of time, both now and in the future. Steve could you post > to the IOLTC asking them about their current table standards? I did so, and John Neal started to reply, but then figured it would be better to discuss it here so that others could contribute to - and benefit from - the discussion. OK John - you have the floor... 8-) SRC L#765 StRuCtures

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001))
(...) Ahem, well, okay then:-) First off, I will say that there is no current "standard". The GMLTC used 30"x45" tables for our last layout (actually just a skosh longer on each dimension to avoid module buckling). This size is convenient because (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator and the sunken small table originally for a small port. Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

23 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search