Northern Alberta LEGO Users Group : 633


Organizations / Canada / NALUG / 633	632 \| 634

Subject:	Re: Bridge status and ideas (was Constructions for GEMTS 2001)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.nalug
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2001 00:36:43 GMT
Viewed:	3583 times

> How long is the low table? What low table are you refering to? > Could we go for something like a 45" bridge and have some box/wood > constructed to raise the apparent height of part of the low table? Ummm - That's what I'm suggesting. (My bridge is _exactly_ 45" in fact.) By lowering "the table" 16 bricks, the bridge deck and track would be level with the other tables, as Kevin pointed out quite some time ago. My mountain/valley/tunnel idea is just a nice-all-LEGO-looking implementation of the concept. It _would_ require lots of grey bricks though; As James says - possibly more than he has... SRC L#765 StRuCtures

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Bridge status and ideas (was Constructions for GEMTS 2001)
The low table I made last year is one of the small 30.5x30.5 inch guys, it is more like a canyon, with vertical walls on three sides and open on only one side. The walls are there to attach to the adjacent tables with the usual bolt holes. I think (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Bridge status and ideas (was Constructions for GEMTS 2001)
John Koob wrote in message ... (...) Clarification - 30" is a bit short, but 60" is too long. How long is the low table? Could we go for something like a 45" bridge and have some box/wood constructed to raise the apparent height of part of the low (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

23 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search