Subject:
|
Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 May 2001 01:10:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5707 times
|
| |
|
|
As everyone knows, I don't have a garage. So, no carpentry
party at my place, unfortunately.
But I would be able and willing to do all of the painting.
Oh, does anyone have brushes I could borrow? :-]
John
Michel Magnan wrote in message ...
> The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole
> for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator
> and the sunken small table originally for a small port.
> Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my parents place.
> Anyone interested in a work bee to build another 2 or 3 sets?
> I could easily cut all the 1x2 needed on my table saw in St Paul, and bring
> the small pieces to Edmonton. Someone there could get the plywood cut in
> the 2 larger pieces from each sheet. Everyone who owns a drill would meet
> in someones garage and we could build several sets in a day. Someone would
> then have to paint them, a major pain, because the green needs 2 coats, • plus
> the primer. The legs are very labor intensive, and I still haven't • finished
> the legs from the tables I made last year. I believe that the PNLTC guys
> have eliminated the attacheable legs, due to the long set up time. If we
> could somehow use folding legs that would save a lot of time, both now and
> in the future. Steve could you post to the IOLTC asking them about their
> current table standards?
> I don't have a problem making them by myself, but it is the storage issue
> that is proving to be a major thorn in my wifes side. I would appreciate • it
> if someone would atleast offer to paint them, if I end up making another
> couple of sets in St Paul. And someone needs to store them.
> Michel
>
> > > > Right now there aren't enough tables, period. We have 6 full
> > > sets, counting the roundhouse and the blue-topped 30x30.
> >
> > I seem to recall Michel saying at some point that the table count had
> > turned out to be inaccurate?? Six full sets as in six 30x60s and six
> > 30x30s? That would mean then that two additional 30x60s (plus
> > something lower for the mountain/bridge section) would be needed?
> >
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
|
| The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator and the sunken small table originally for a small port. Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my (...) (25 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
