Northern Alberta LEGO Users Group : 629


Organizations / Canada / NALUG / 629	628 \| 630

Subject:	Re: Bridge status and ideas (was Constructions for GEMTS 2001)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.nalug
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2001 02:35:57 GMT
Viewed:	3352 times

James Brown wrote in message ... > OK. John, you're our next stop on the "heaps of technic" train, would you > be willing to tackle a short (30" or less) trestle bridge, possible a • double > track bridge? I'd have enough to do a double track trestle, but 30" is a bit short... Something longer would look better, but would mean borrowing or acquiring some more black beams. More beams ... I like the sound of that. In short, I'm willing. -- John (remove the obvious to reply)

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Bridge status and ideas (was Constructions for GEMTS 2001)
John Koob wrote in message ... (...) Clarification - 30" is a bit short, but 60" is too long. How long is the low table? Could we go for something like a 45" bridge and have some box/wood constructed to raise the apparent height of part of the low (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Bridge status and ideas (was Constructions for GEMTS 2001)
(...) We don't have the room at GEMTS to elevate track to the level required for your arch bridge, not without dedicating a full two thirds of our space to elevating the track, and consiquently obscuring at least 1/2 of our layout behind (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

23 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search