To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trains.orgOpen lugnet.trains.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / Train Organizations / 1244
1243  |  1245
Subject: 
Re: Stop the madness...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:06:43 GMT
Viewed: 
495 times
  
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G9H6Ju.Aty@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.trains.org, Eric Kingsley writes:
Steve,


[ ... snipped ... ]


I'm not Steve.

I'm not Steve either but I did meet him (and three other members of PNLTC -
Dwayne, Kim, Dave) last night here in Portland.  Lots of great conversation,
including the subject of the proposed list.


But I think the idea was that the mailing list would be private... and • when
LD was to be notified of something, someone would tell them but say they
were speaking with the consensus of the group. If LD wanted to say
something, they would send it to that one member who forwards it to the
list... (I don't know if there are such things as "write only memberships"
on pairlist, that is, you can write to a mailing list but not read it. • Mike?
I don't think Yahoogroups has that. If so, that removes the need for an
intermediary to receive the message and forward it on)

Pairlist (which is is based on MailMain) has a number of controls over the
ability to post to the list.  The list that I have created only allows
members to post to the list.  Any post my a non-list member gets held and
sent to the list admin for approval.  The list admin can either reject it,
approve it, or defer it (although I am not sure what value derferal is).

Since this smacks of negotiating "on behalf of" groups that may not be • very
common, or maybe it's not what Steve meant. (Mutual Aid societies aid each
other but don't usually negotiate with third parties, the individual • members
do that on their own... after sharing info and strategies with each other • on
the third party)

++Lar

Based on the conversation we had last night, I completely support what Steve
is trying to do.  I will let Steve comment (or not, his decision) on the
overall objectives of the list but I do believe it is necessary and in the
long run, will benefit the vast majority of us (no matter what you do
someone will always be unhappy).

Mike

--

Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com
http://www.nclug.net - North Carolina LEGO Users Group
http://www.nclug.net/ctb - Carolina Train Builders
http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?u=mpw - Brick Depot



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Stop the madness...
 
(...) I'm not Steve. But I think the idea was that the mailing list would be private... and when LD was to be notified of something, someone would tell them but say they were speaking with the consensus of the group. If LD wanted to say something, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)

10 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR