 | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —James Brown
|
| | | (...) I don't think that the LUG vs LTC thing is really relevant. As a prime example, NALUG has done 2 trains shows, intends to do more in the future, but has no intention or desire to form a seperate LTC - we're stunningly informal as it is, and it (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) Same for NELUG. (...) I agree with James and I would add "why GATS and NMRA"? Here in the New England they don't even come around for us to display. Our main option is Greenberg which is mostly up and down the East Coast. Plus others do (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) Just using those as an example because I thought that they are the most common nationwide. Participating in *any* public train show is fine by me:-) -John (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Martin Scragg
|
| | | | | | (...) This is especially true if you want the 'I' to stand for 'International'. Martin (In Australia) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message news:G9FsvA.47n@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] . (...) to (...) NCLUG is a similar situation - NCLUG/NCLTC would essentially be one in the same. That may not always be the case (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | | | If you are going to form IOLTC please--PLEASE have no age restrictions as the TEEN LEGO TRAIN CLUB may be forming and would like to have deligates in the IOLTC. thanks kai (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) ^^^ "the" or "a"? What region does it cover? --Todd (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, let's talk about this, because there are some gray areas here. If a club/group are committed to showing at train shows, then why the reticence using the LTC name form? I don't think it's silly to use both, because perhaps there are or (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) In a nutshell, because while we do trains, it's not *all* we do. (It's just all we've done lately...) And we don't (disclaimer: I'm making an assumption here - I haven't checked with NALUG lately, these are things we bantered around last (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) That's a great way of phrasing it. Absolutely -- LTC's are a special case of LUGs. --Todd (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The formation of an ILTCO —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | (...) Well I can talk from a NELUG perspective. Personally I see no need for both an LTC and LUG in the area. We get along great just as we are, heck I don't think we have a single "Hard Core" Train head in the group. Actually I see the train shows (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
