 | | Re: LEGO Trains on trial?
|
|
(...) EEE...EEEHHH...HHH wrong if you read the rules you can only enter A CAR (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?)
|
|
(...) Hmm? What constitutes "a car"? 1) Would a double-stack container group with shared wheelsets be more than one "car"? 2) Is a steam locomotive with tender actually TWO "cars"? (unlikely to be viewed as two separate "cars", but can it literall (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?)
|
|
(...) I definitely agree on this, the contest should draw a few more trainheads into the fold. And as for my method of picture-taking, I have no choice but to use a disposable for this. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?)
|
|
(...) Interesting thought on this: many, perhaps most or even all, photo processing services use digital processing these days. The negatives are stilled developed the old-fashioned way (no way to avoid that), but then they are fed into a unit that (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?)
|
|
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, James Mathis (<G6nuu2.GE7@lugnet.com>) wrote at 23:06:02 (...) Haven't read the rules, but perhaps they mean 'no CAD models'. (23 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
