 | | Re: "fake metroliners"
|
| kai brodersen wrote in message ... (...) to (...) lego (...) my (...) Imagine what would happen to the market if TLC granted all wishes... IMHO, a set without box and original instructions is not a set, it's a bad copy. And not worth more than the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: "fake metroliners"
|
| a set without box and original instructions is not a set, it's a bad copy. And not worth more than the pieces in it. (...) Hi Joakim I have to disagree with you on this, a box and instructions don't make set original, unless this set has no special (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: "fake metroliners"
|
| "Paul Rutenberg" <paul_germany@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G333Iv.1FM@lugnet.com... (...) set, (...) 316, (...) only (...) but no (...) parts (...) with (...) boy (...) Hello Paul. What I really ment was that, I do not consider it the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: "fake metroliners"
|
| Hi (...) This time your right the 5x6 with hole is in a train set, 4x6 is in 316, sorry about that, and i just put my second 316 together last weekend too, oh well :-) (...) Paul (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: "fake metroliners"
|
| (...) I'm beginning to feel that all but a very few sets are always worth more as parts then as a set. (...) Ultimately, my interest is in the pieces. I do have just enough collectors blood to be shooting for "Pirate Complete", but I'm willing to be (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
