 | | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) But rotations in 22.5 degree increments would be better, of course, and 11.25 might even be best, as we are then at the resolution of a curve segment, no? Since that requires rather complex calculations, it's more natural to have a rendering (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) I forgot to say that Magenta was the color I picked to be the "transparent" color because I did not use any magenta or anything remotely close to Magenta, in my bitmap image. This may well be a "MS Paint" thing, I forget where I was working at (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show) —Matthew Bates
| | | | | (...) No, curves are 22.5 degrees. If you give Track Designer bitmaps at 0, 22.5, 45 and 67.5 degrees it can generate all the other possible rotations. However, the existing registry only has track at all these rotations, road plates, monorail[1] (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Duh, yes. 11.25 is just wishful thinking. Never mind. Well one teeny downside to your switch proposal is the new geometries that would result. worth it though, to be free from the tyranny the current geometry imposes. (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
