Subject:
|
Re: Looking for Set # 3225
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 May 2000 18:38:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
558 times
|
| |
|
|
John Neal wrote:
> Oh, don't get me wrong-- I think it's a *great* deal for parts....I *did* buy 44
> of them. All I meant was that he shouldn't buy the set for the engine and the
> cars, because they are really weak *models*.
Of course you probably think any TLC model is weak since they aren't 8
wide :-)
> I meant to suggest that if he
> really likes the engine or cars, then he should build them from scratch himself.
In 8 wide? :-)
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Looking for Set # 3225
|
| (...) lol Well, no, but they could be a lot *better* 8 wide;-) But that engine from the 3225 is lame. Even my 10 year old son builds engines light years ahead of that thing. (...) Or 14 wide; whichever. -John (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Looking for Set # 3225
|
| (...) Oh, don't get me wrong-- I think it's a *great* deal for parts....I *did* buy 44 of them. All I meant was that he shouldn't buy the set for the engine and the cars, because they are really weak *models*. I meant to suggest that if he really (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
