 | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| Chris, The GP-35s look great, even better now that you've added the twin. Its so hard to get that front end to look correct (even with 8 wide I would think), but you've done a good job of it. I could easily tell what kind of engines they were by (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| (...) Thanks James! The angle on the front has bothered me for a while. It's too shallow to be represented by the 45 degree slopes, but I am happy with my current solution. When I rebuild these eight wide in a few months I am going to try to use the (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| (...) Hey Chris that gp-35 is bad-a**! i like it. i got a few designs myself(all cad though) all at (URL) or (URL) I plan to do online instructions for the dash 8 - 40 loco (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| (...) Chris, I do not know what you mean; I am being dense. Could you explain a bit more. Thanks, Chris (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| Christopher Tracey wrote in message <392B4DAB.6F264949@e...nk.org>... (...) I did use the 45 degree slopes, I know the angle isn't perfect, but it still gave a good look for the size of the engine. I built the engines on the long red train plates. (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| (...) On the front of the engine where there currently is a 4x4 yellow plate and a 2x4 yellow low slope peak brick. I used this to represent the pointed front of the engine. Some other people have used 2x4 slope bricks to represent the point. I (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| Yep, that clears it up. You think the low slopes (the 4x3x1, 2x3x1, or 1x3x1) would make a better nose. I thought you meant the 2x2x2 steep slopes. Thanks, Chris (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
