Subject:
|
Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 May 2000 14:36:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@cmasi.chem^StopSpam^.tulane.edu
|
Viewed:
|
1344 times
|
| |
|
|
Yep, that clears it up. You think the low slopes (the 4x3x1, 2x3x1, or 1x3x1)
would make a better nose. I thought you meant the 2x2x2 steep slopes.
Thanks,
Chris
Christopher Tracey wrote:
> Christopher Masi wrote:
> > I do not know what you mean; I am being dense. Could you explain a bit more.
>
> On the front of the engine where there currently is a 4x4 yellow plate
> and a 2x4 yellow low slope peak brick. I used this to represent the
> pointed front of the engine. Some other people have used 2x4 slope
> bricks to represent the point. I thought that they are two steep for
> the look i was trying to get, so I used the plate method. It looks
> like a real GP-35 has a point of about 15-20 degrees, which is hard
> to model in six-wide scale.
>
> Does that clear it up any?
>
> -Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: GP-35 Revisited
|
| (...) On the front of the engine where there currently is a 4x4 yellow plate and a 2x4 yellow low slope peak brick. I used this to represent the pointed front of the engine. Some other people have used 2x4 slope bricks to represent the point. I (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
