Subject:
|
Re: My Inverted Hopper Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 04:10:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
603 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> That is a very clever design, Dean. Funny, I was just talking to Mike
> Poindexter last night and he was talking about doing the same thing! Now,
> here is what I think: If you can come up with this ingenious design to get
> around using rare parts, you could prolly create an MOC that is better in
> design than TLC's in the first place! Heck, look at Lar's design. You
> could start by improving on his design-- hint: begin by making it 8 wide;-)
That's been done... Mike Poindexter did it. However it's not clear that it was
an improvement, per se. Bigger does not always automatically equate to Better.
(also GD&R)
Dean my advice to you is not to (try to) improve on my design... but to go
forth and do a car that's not been done in large quantities before.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Inverted Hopper Design
|
| (...) Being new to trains, (1 Year on the 29th. 4565 B-Day prezzy from wife) I've gone from following directions to variations on the directions to MOC's. I have a cute little tanker that I did back before we pooled our LEGO. (My wife has much more (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Inverted Hopper Design
|
| That is a very clever design, Dean. Funny, I was just talking to Mike Poindexter last night and he was talking about doing the same thing! Now, here is what I think: If you can come up with this ingenious design to get around using rare parts, you (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
