Subject:
|
Re: My Inverted Hopper Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 03:24:34 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@ANTISPAMuswest.net
|
Viewed:
|
626 times
|
| |
| |
That is a very clever design, Dean. Funny, I was just talking to Mike
Poindexter last night and he was talking about doing the same thing! Now,
here is what I think: If you can come up with this ingenious design to get
around using rare parts, you could prolly create an MOC that is better in
design than TLC's in the first place! Heck, look at Lar's design. You
could start by improving on his design-- hint: begin by making it 8 wide;-)
<g,d&r>
-John
Dean Husby wrote:
> I've been trying to create a fleet of Hoppers without having to use rare
> parts that I do not posses.
>
> Below is my first attempt and I think it worked out pretty good.
>
> http://www.akasa.bc.ca/tfm/lego_invertedhopper.html
>
> I'd love to hear your comments.
>
> Dean
> --
> Coin-Op's For Sale!: http://www.akasa.bc.ca/tfm/coin-op.html
> Dean's Lego Workshop: http://www.akasa.bc.ca/tfm/lego_wr.html
> Vancouver Lego Club: http://www.akasa.bc.ca/vlc
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: My Inverted Hopper Design
|
| (...) That's been done... Mike Poindexter did it. However it's not clear that it was an improvement, per se. Bigger does not always automatically equate to Better. (also GD&R) Dean my advice to you is not to (try to) improve on my design... but to (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | My Inverted Hopper Design
|
| I've been trying to create a fleet of Hoppers without having to use rare parts that I do not posses. Below is my first attempt and I think it worked out pretty good. (URL) love to hear your comments. Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains) !
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|