Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:02:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
837 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Gary Louie wrote in message <369D13E5.AFCF82B3@EarthLink.Net>...
> "Eric Brok" <brok@fcjsvc.hvu.nl> wrote
>
> > Matthew Bates wrote in message ...
> > > Here's my opinion on the new sets (in descending order)
> > >
> > > 1. 4519 Cross track. Very cool. Really the only 99 set that is in the same
> > > league as the original 1991 train sets. A Must Buy
> >
> >
> > Too bad it's isn't a sheared crossing, lik the DUPLO one.
>
>
> Sheard crossing? What is a sheared crossing? Is it a non 90 degree
> crossing, like a 45/135 degree ctossing?
Yes, that's what I meant. There should be a crossing to connect
switches/points in a dual cross-over setup.
Eric Brok
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets
|
| Eric Brok writes: > (...) I too would like to see a diamond crossing (that's what I call it anyway) but that would require a new style of points/switch. The current one curves one way and then starts curving back the other way, so even if Lego made (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets
|
| "Eric Brok" <brok@fcjsvc.hvu.nl> wrote (...) Sheard crossing? What is a sheared crossing? Is it a non 90 degree crossing, like a 45/135 degree ctossing? I'm confused. Too bad Duplo trains can't run on 12V/4.5V/9V setups. Gary GaryLouie@EarthLink.Net (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
13 Messages in This Thread: ![Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Matthew Bates (4-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Eric Brok (5-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Gary Louie (13-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Matthew Bates (14-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Steve Bliss (5-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -John Neal (5-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Thomas Main (5-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -John Neal (5-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Matthew Bates (6-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -John Neal (6-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Jeremy H. Sproat (16-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets -Thomas P. Rafert (16-Jan-99 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|