| |
If there is a "cost" issue between the 1.0 and 1.5, Has anyone seen the savings
passed on to the buyers? Probably too mutch to ask.... ;-)
-Rich
In lugnet.trains, Matthew Miller writes:
> sebarile-MOBL <steve.e.barile@intel.com> wrote:
> > Consumer Affairs told me that after talking to many focus groups that they
> > decided it was not used and thus cut for cost savings again (standard good
> > corp practice)... and good for them, it seems like they need to cut some
> > corners to stay in business.
>
> Despite the fact that a lot of people here use wall power, I think that CA
> is probably right in that the vast majority of mindstorms robots are
> vehicles. Ah well. Something for "Dear Lego"....
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
> Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Powering trains w/ RCX
|
| (...) savings (...) Well, lets think, a rectification bridge, a voltage regulator, and an external power connector. In 'trade' quantities, you are talking well under 50 cents (probably more like 20 cents). If Lego are paying much more than this for (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Powering trains w/ RCX
|
| (...) Despite the fact that a lot of people here use wall power, I think that CA is probably right in that the vast majority of mindstorms robots are vehicles. Ah well. Something for "Dear Lego".... (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
