Subject:
|
Re: Ararat 1972
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:54:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
22134 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
Actually the whole thing is now destroyed so there’s no plans to do anything.
Mike and I live 1800km apart so it was a one-off for the convention. We are
thinking about doing another layout next year though.
|
Sorry to hear that it doesn’t exist anymore.
 I do love
collaborations, though; we did the same sort of thing with
Jonathan Lopes in Detroit back
in 2007.
| |
But again I think it will just be one side. I much prefer the ‘cutting’ style
of layout as it gives a more realistic look and allows one to completely
ignore the grid.
|
Yes, I like that effect, but that doesn’t mean that one couldn’t detail the
other side of the curtain as well, n’est pas?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ararat 1972
|
| (...) I remember that one well. Excellent :) (...) This is true. But making this took my entire luggage allowance so any expansion would involve mailing stuff etc. Doable but a pain. I have actually considered that style of project for my own, very (...) (14 years ago, 22-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ararat 1972
|
| (...) Hi John, I hear you on the 1x1 plates although I think the ballast round Victoria is quite smooth which is why it doesn't have them. Mike built the track and as one of the most pedantic train builders I know I assume he had a reason ;) (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
