|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.announce, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
|
The 9V, RC and Power Functions train motors compete around a track under
close scrutiny of an on-board NXT...
Complete test results here.
|
Okay, this is awesome work, Philippe, to see the comparison of the new PF
motor vs the 9 volt motor. As an eight wider, I always lamented the
underpowered 9 volt motor in its attempts to pull heavy, 8 wide consists. But
it wasnt such an issue because one could always just add more motors. There
certainly were, however, diminished returns in terms of track voltage. We at
the TCLTC used souped up speed controllers, but that still didnt solve the
problem of overheated, over-worked 9 volt motors.
Though I would never switch to the new track, I would consider retooling with
these superior motors.
I havent even checked to see if these are available yet on US SAH.
In any event, thanks for posting!
JOHN
|
Ditto, except 6 wide.
Thanks, Phillipe.
Ed
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Train motors comparison
|
| (...) Okay, this is awesome work, Philippe, to see the comparison of the new PF motor vs the 9 volt motor. As an eight wider, I always lamented the underpowered 9 volt motor in its attempts to pull heavy, 8 wide consists. But it wasn't such an issue (...) (14 years ago, 1-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|