Subject:
|
Re: Is the Emerald Night (PF) Slow?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 May 2009 07:56:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
17585 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.trains, Bruce S. Chamberlain wrote:
> Slower is more realistic and will not derail on corners.
Some of the late steam era passenger trains could manage quite a pace. Besides,
the occasional catastrophic LEGO train derailment can be kinda fun! With the
maximum speed I am generating, derailment is not a risk.
> The better question is how many cars
> can it pull slowly and how long does the battery last?
Absolutely true. Unfortunately my rolling stock is in deep storage (for reasons
too long to explain), so I cannot put that to the test. With luck, the lack of
speed I am experiencing with the XL motor will be offset by torque and pulling
power. I have yet to run the battery down myself, but from what I have read
elsewhere, battery time should be satisfactory for my purposes.
Thanks, more input is welcomed!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Is the Emerald Night (PF) Slow?
|
| (...) You have to realize that the Power Functions XL motor turns VERY slowly for a LEGO motor to begin with, but it's got an awesome amount of torque. If you want your locomotive to go faster right away, just slap a medium PF motor in its' place. (...) (15 years ago, 4-Aug-09, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Is the Emerald Night (PF) Slow?
|
| (...) Slower is more realistic and will not derail on corners. I always run my steam engines as slow as I can without stalling. The better question is how many cars can it pull slowly and how long does the battery last? Thanks, Bruce (16 years ago, 18-May-09, to lugnet.trains)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
