 | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —John Neal
|
| | | In lugnet.trains, Eric Kingsley wrote: <snip> (...) Really? I don't see the connection here, Eric. Why would TLG equate the success of this set with an endorsement of the 9 volt system? I'd like to think that there is some definitive way to express (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —Elroy Davis
|
| | | | | (...) Eric might have more info on this than I do, but from what I can tell, TLG is marketing this set as part of the 9v system, so purchasing this set would show an interest in that system. I know last night when I hit the Shop at Home site to (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | (...) Elroy pretty much has it. This set is marketed as part of the 9v Electric system. It is meant for LEGO Train "Hobbiests" not just kids that want to build a LEGO kit and watch it go around the track a few times. Everyone is welcome to their own (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) It's not a question of whether or not I'll buy the set. Even if I didn't want the set, I would consider purchasing it if I knew that it had a direct bearing on the fate of 9 volt (which I'd like to continue). I think you and DaveE have made (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Because Lego notices the distinct markets of toy trains and hobby trains. The toy train market is for kids, the hobby trains are for adults. Lego knows that hobbyists are after electrical track. Whether or not it's a 9v system probably isn't (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Yes, but I'd argue that the current 9 volt system is a toy train sytem. Hobbyists are after something more complex, like DCC, motorized switches, alternative geometries on curves, DRIVERS FOR STEAM ENGINES, etc. It is remarkable to me that TLG (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —Elroy Davis
|
| | | | | (...) I think this mostly comes from what was mentioned last year at BrickFest about Lego creating a "Hobby" line of trains. I suppose it depends on the definition of hobbyist in this case. If you're talking in terms of model railroaders, then I'd (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10183 Hobby Train Review —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure what you're saying. That because Lego doesn't have a DCC system, arbitrary curve geometry, etc, that Lego doesn't *have* a hobbyist market? Here's the skinny: You've got people who don't care if we switch to a battery system, and (...) (17 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
