 | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| I'm of two minds here. I think being inside an organization is often a way to effect change. After all, that's why I was a registered Democrat the whole time we lived in NY, Democrats were where the power was. Never gave up on being Libertarian. So (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| (...) By that theory we should be infiltrating TLC, not the NMRA. (...) Explain. (...) I *still* look down on LGB-- it sucks almost as badly as Lionel. <commencing flame suit donnage> -John (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| (...) I think we should have both an NMRA SIG, and an independant LTMA. There will be some duplication of energies, but an LTMA would probably be more capable of making itself visible outside the hobby (article in Mania Magazine, representation at (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Frank Filz (<383BEDF8.4E1@mindspring.com>) wrote at 13:54:00 (...) 'scuse me, can someone say what a SIG is, for someone into LEGO trains, but not other sorts, and not in N. America? (25 years ago, 25-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| (...) Sure Tony, a SIG is a Special Interest Group. It is how the NMRA (which is actually quite international) describes subgroups within the NMRA. For example, there is a DCC SIG, the Layout Design SIG, and the Narrow Gauge SIG ect... James (25 years ago, 25-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
| On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, James Powell (<FLqD0I.Ax3@lugnet.com>) wrote at 01:48:18 (...) Aha! I figured it was something of the sort. Thanks for the info :-) (25 years ago, 25-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
| |
