To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 26520
26519  |  26521
Subject: 
Re: Seven wide Koef Shunter
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:54:50 GMT
Viewed: 
4341 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
  
   Looks great, Tim. I think the smaller models require more clever bits to be convincing such as the use of the 1x6 arches. 7-wide is beginning to grow on me too!

Jon

Hi Jon,

Thanks for your comments. I agree about smaller models being more fun. I love having to find ways around problems that would be so simple to solve in eight-wide or larger.

But... don’t get into seven-wide!!! Seven-wide is pretty much doomed if we don’t keep getting the 9V stock. That said, if I can I’m going to cut the baseplate off the battery pack and see what I can do if I’m forced to.

I try to use it only for wide prototypes like Russian and Indian, partially because I like using the standard train plates and partially because I consider myself a six-wider. I see seven-wide as wide six-wide. This one was an accident as I thought it was wide gauge from the first pics I saw and by then had decided on my plan.

Tim

I’ve enough 9v stuff to keep me going for a bit but I take your point regarding the IR trains - difficult but not impossible in 7-wide.

I also look on 7-wide as a wide 6-wide. I’ve seen some very convincing MOC examples and note that you can get away with the same loco/wagon length as the 6-wide models, or at least very close to it. Some wagons would remain 6-wide as they are prototypically narrower as would be my tube train.

Apart for the visual appeal of the additional width, it would have been a lot easier to build my class 08 shunter...

http://news.lugnet.com/announce/moc/?n=2683

...with that extra sud width!

Jon

.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Seven wide Koef Shunter
 
(...) Hi Jon, Thanks for your comments. I agree about smaller models being more fun. I love having to find ways around problems that would be so simple to solve in eight-wide or larger. But... don't get into seven-wide!!! Seven-wide is pretty much (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR