Subject:
|
Re: And now for something completely different....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:14:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1946 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi wrote:
| |
Samarth Moray <legoswami wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Tim David wrote:
SNIP
That’s really lovely. Looks a bit incomplete without an A unit, but still....
|
|
What, this A
unit?
| |
| |
Would love to see it with Ross Neal’s GP-38.
Legoswami
|
Which one, his 2-wide version or his 8-wide version? I think that the
combination of this 6-wide B Unit and either of those would look a bit
silly :)
|
Was looking at that earlier, I though it was a
GP50 tho’
Have to agree, it wasn’t built to be very accurate, but as a speedy method to
get building after a spot of ‘builders-block’ and to go with the 10133. (OK the
GP38 2B hasn’t been repainted yet in my world!)
| |
I guess this would be an example of three great things that go together
badly (as opposed to, say, peanut butter and chocolate for example).
|
Peanut butter and honey... mmmmm
Thanks Chris, and thanks Swami
Tim
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: And now for something completely different....
|
| (...) Whoops, my bad, Ross's is labeled GP50. (...) I wasn't commenting on the accuracy of your model, I was just making a silly size joke. After all, Ross "Son of 8-wide" Neal builds a bit bigger. I think your B-Unit is great regardless of size. (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | US MOC loco numbering
|
| (...) This brings me to a question that was bothering me when i was looking throught the NMRA photos. I don't know my US loco classes by sight so I was looking up the numbers to find what the MOCs represented. None of them seemed to have correct (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: And now for something completely different....
|
| (...) Which one, his 2-wide version or his 8-wide version? I think that the combination of this 6-wide B Unit and either of those would look a bit silly :) I guess this would be an example of three great things that go together badly (as opposed to, (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
