Subject:
|
Re: best way to support elevated plates?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 May 2005 19:17:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2191 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Joe Strout wrote:
> In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > Consider GMLTC lattice. Strong, light, made of common elements and modular in
> > that it conforms to various heights well.
> >
> > XFUT lugnet.trains... a search with this string "GMLTC lattice" should find you
> > a pic of it...
>
> Sounds like what I'm after. Unfortunately, a search for "GMLTC lattice" didn't
> turn up any posts, except for yours, with both words in it. I also tried the
> same search at brickshelf, with no luck. Can anyone point me to a picture or
> more detailed description of this structure?
Sorry for the bum steer. (it was under honeycomb not lattice, my bad)
Try this post: http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=8776 which leads you to this
pic:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=18100
That should set you right.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: best way to support elevated plates?
|
| (...) And check out (URL) pic> and (URL) pic> to see that method in action. Ironically, we just completely cannibalized that module last week... Wanna buy some 2x2 towers? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 12-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: best way to support elevated plates?
|
| (...) Sounds like what I'm after. Unfortunately, a search for "GMLTC lattice" didn't turn up any posts, except for yours, with both words in it. I also tried the same search at brickshelf, with no luck. Can anyone point me to a picture or more (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
