 | | Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —James Wilson
|
| | | I figured I wouldn't get flamed too badly on the "friendliest place on the Internet" -- what is the status of individual railroads' passenger service in the U.S.?? I was under the impression that Amtrak provided (almost?) all inter-city passenger (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Essentially no. There is some commuter rail service operated by metro transit authorities (Boston is the example I'm most familiar with). There are a variety of tourist railroads, but they mostly don't serve as general transportation. Frank (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Jason Spears
|
| | | | | (...) Well I just took a non-Amtrak train from Michigan City to Chicago yesterday. (URL) NICTD> provides service from South Bend into Chicago and has for many years. Also (URL) Metra> has trains that run from downtown Chicago into a lot of the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) South Shore is probably commuter, and Metra certainly is commuter, so not covered under the enabling legislation which applies to "scheduled revenue intercity service" (Most normal people would call Michigan City a different city than Chicago (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Jason Spears
|
| | | | | | (...) Well seeing as how they are 60 miles apart and South Bend (which is serviced by South Shore) is 90 miles from Chicago, I'd think they are different cities. But what do I know? Jason Spears | (URL) House of Bricks> | (URL) BrickCentral> | (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) It may have been a shipper inspection train, or an excursion, those are both not "scheduled revenue intercity" service and thus not subject to the provisions of the Amtrak legislation. (...) As Frank said, no, not intercity. The deal made with (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —James Wilson
|
| | | | | Thanks, Larry, and everyone else. I'm not sure what I saw - several matching passenger cars with an F-class locomotive in the same livery. Seems like I used to occasionaly see a UP or SP passenger train when I lived in Austin, too. Probably private (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Steven Barile
|
| | | | FYI there is also a "ski train" running from Denver into the Rockies that is painted the D&RGW colors. Of course that falls into the excursion catagory, but must be a site to see! (URL) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) that D&RGW was a late entrant into Amtrak, as it was run by them for a while and was a money maker for them. I'm not up on the history of it and whether they still run it or whether an excursion company does, or what. (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
