Subject:
|
Re: Remote Switch plan
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:39:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
977 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
> > Yes, that would be feature #3: Works with unmodified switches. :-)
>
> You expect me to actually read your stuff???
>
> > Though, to be honest, I don't know whether I have the new stiffer
> > switches or not, so I'm not 100% on that. (Still waiting for someone
> > who knows they have the stiff switches to try the design out.) It
> > does, however, seem to have plenty of "torque to burn" as you say...
>
> I got a pair of brand new unopened switches, still in the box. I'll bring • them
> to BF 2004 PDX and we can test it all out there, what do you say? Deal?
Gee, I thought I might get an answer sooner than that! :-) Too early
to tell with any certainty about BFPDX, but I did run it by my NLSO
and she's OK with being in Portland on Valentine's day, so hopefully
everything else will fall in line!
Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Remote Switch plan
|
| (...) You expect me to actually read your stuff??? (...) I got a pair of brand new unopened switches, still in the box. I'll bring them to BF 2004 PDX and we can test it all out there, what do you say? Deal? (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
