Subject:
|
Re: Remote Switch plan
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 03:55:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1015 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
> Yes, that would be feature #3: Works with unmodified switches. :-)
You expect me to actually read your stuff???
> Though, to be honest, I don't know whether I have the new stiffer
> switches or not, so I'm not 100% on that. (Still waiting for someone
> who knows they have the stiff switches to try the design out.) It
> does, however, seem to have plenty of "torque to burn" as you say...
I got a pair of brand new unopened switches, still in the box. I'll bring them
to BF 2004 PDX and we can test it all out there, what do you say? Deal?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Remote Switch plan
|
| (...) them (...) Gee, I thought I might get an answer sooner than that! :-) Too early to tell with any certainty about BFPDX, but I did run it by my NLSO and she's OK with being in Portland on Valentine's day, so hopefully everything else will fall (...) (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Remote Switch plan
|
| Yes, that would be feature #3: Works with unmodified switches. :-) Though, to be honest, I don't know whether I have the new stiffer switches or not, so I'm not 100% on that. (Still waiting for someone who knows they have the stiff switches to try (...) (21 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
