Subject:
|
Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:53:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
673 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
>
>
> Jake McKee wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > > Jake, you have achieved the status in my mind of "master minifig scale
> > > train builder"! I really like the way you put a train together:-)
> >
> > But John, you realize that is this a mere 6-wide model, right?
>
> "Mere"?-- lol Well, of course; that is what I meant by "minifig scale". You,
> as does James Mathis (good company, I know:), have the ability to pull off a 6
> wide version of a loco and still make it look good.
<snip>
Hey, hey, don't bring me into this if this is going to spur another
6-wide/8-wide discussion! "I build both ways!" ;-)
Never mind that here's an 8-wide idea for a double-deck automobile carrier:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=15151
Whoah, virtual model parts intensive. 6-wide loco pulling 8-wide rolling
stock; when scales collide.
Now, back to browsing all the cool new train club event pics at BrickShelf...
Ah.....
later!
James Mathis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) "Soo that's the way it is in that family" ;-) (...) Figmund Sreud would have a field day with you, James-- a 6 wide id with an 8 wide super ego;-) In any event, nice cars:-) -John (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) "Mere"?-- lol Well, of course; that is what I meant by "minifig scale". You, as does James Mathis (good company, I know:), have the ability to pull off a 6 wide version of a loco and still make it look good. It has to do with creative (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
