Subject:
|
Re: 8 wide Super Chief (Kjeld was right!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 05:30:12 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
john@tcltcSTOPSPAM.org
|
Viewed:
|
419 times
|
| |
|
|
Andreas Stabno wrote:
> Nice job, John. This may be the first honest comparison between 6-wide and
> 8-wide models. Since there has been a debate on how many more bricks it
> takes to go to 8-wide, could you give an estimate as to how many pieces it
> took to build this version? Maybe we can settle that argument once and for all.
Thanks, Andreas-- you asked for it, you got it, Toyota;-)
As for brick count, well, I couldn't even guess. I did *a lot* of SNOT work which
is really a lot of monkey business that drives up piece count. Comparing mine with
the 10020 in a way other than by looks alone is a little like comparing apples and
oranges. I can say this-- if I were to convert my own MOC to 6 wide, I really
wouldn't reduce the piece count dramatically at all. The profile would remain the
same, and only a few bricks would be eliminated widthwise (many would simply be
reduced *in size*, so that wouldn't affect quantity).
Piece count IMO is a non-issue in the whole "debate"-- it's about a"toyish" look
verses a more prototypical look. Both have their place, just like Duplo and
Technic.... (did I just compare 6 wide to Duplo? Not really, since even Duplo is 8
wide;-)
-John
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andreas
> http://www.lugnet.com/~19/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 8 wide Super Chief (Kjeld was right!)
|
| (...) Nice job, John. This may be the first honest comparison between 6-wide and 8-wide models. Since there has been a debate on how many more bricks it takes to go to 8-wide, could you give an estimate as to how many pieces it took to build this (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
