 | | Is the word out? (Was Re: 10020 Registry opinion) —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | I agree with the rest of the people that have posted that the registry is a good idea but I wonder how many sets are NOT going to get 'registered' because a) people don't know about it (parent's who buy it for the kids, non-lego train collectors, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Is the word out? (Was Re: 10020 Registry opinion) —James Mathis
|
| | | | | (...) In hindsight: Too bad LEGO(R) didn't include a "registration card" in the Super Chief box to be sent back to LEGO for such a documentation record. But, perhaps LEGO already thought of this and deemed it too much work to keep track of (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Is the word out? (Was Re: 10020 Registry opinion) —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | (...) Well if anything the SF registry will show us that we ("LUGNET members") are quite the minority in the LEGO market. I doubt we'd ever come close to having all 10,000 listed. I'd be surprised if we ever broke 2,000. And like you stated, a lot (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is the word out? (Was Re: 10020 Registry opinion) —Rose Regner
|
| | | | "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message > (...) are (...) I think that the registry was a great idea for the following reasons; 1. See how many are purchased through LUGNET and RTL people. 2.. Track the distribution of numbers. There (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
