 | | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
Why would this set include a certificate of authenication? "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:GrLD7F.21K@lugnet.com... (...) how (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) Maybe they see the GoB as a threat, and want to compete 8?) On another note, I wonder if they will be available outside the US? ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) I was wondering the same thing. It doesn't show up on the S@H website, not even on the USoA part... Mark -crossing his fingers- de Kock (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) I didn't see that they were going to include a Certificate of Authenticity, just that the set was going to be numbered. ROSCO: I doubt that they consider the Guild of Bricksmiths(tm) a threat, but one does wonder. We're small potatoes but (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) Now whether the engines will be numbered individually or just numbered 27 as shown on the picture is what bothers me. I don't think you can fit 9,999 on a sticker meant for a 1x2 tile. Or they could number the certificate 1 through 9,999 and (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
"Kai Brodersen" <cbrodersen@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:GrMqpK.BAw@lugnet.com... (...) Authenticity, (...) but (...) influence (...) as (...) on (...) The set includes a certificate of authentication as stated in the last sentence of the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue and in Europe!
|
|
(...) I tried to phone Austria this morning on the 00800 number but I got 20 seconds of muzak and was disconnected. Then I e-mailed S@H and they repleyed (on a saterday!). It will be on the site next week (no specific date mentioned but maybe 19 (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) I've seen two different photos of it - one number 27 and one number 301 - so it would seem safe to say that yes there is a certificate and yes each one is numbered individually. The four digit numbers are going to be a bit crowded though... (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
"Steve Chapple" <LEGOArches@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GrnJ59.5D5@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) Yep...(URL)Do you have a link to the one that is numbered 301? (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) GRRRRR, it can't be accessed unless your a member! Josh (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) opps forgot about that...well take my word it does say 301:-) (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
"Chris Leach" <cleach@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:GrnLxE.ApL@lugnet.com... (...) First you have to be a yahoo member, which I am; then you have to be a member of the group "iltco," which I'm not. Can't view it. (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) Sure - I threw it into my Brickshelf gallery... (URL) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 in S@H catalogue?
|
|
(...) Josh (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
