To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 14791
14790  |  14792
Subject: 
Re: Longest train, eh? (was: Two Easy Questions about Rolling Stock)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 1 Feb 2002 05:59:24 GMT
Viewed: 
1816 times
  
> Notes to those who've never done a truly huge train:
> * As Ben mentioned, multiple steady hands on multiple regulators is key.
> Our track wasn't really designed very well for the purpose of a train this
> size, and our regulators weren't evenly spaced.  As a result, the train
> would surge in various places and decouple.

Ya, for those wossies who use more than 1 motor, it is needed.  For those of us
who restrain ourselves to a single motor, one controller is fine :)



> * If you want to use stock magnetic couplers, that is your limiting factor.
> And just tossing in more locomotives in various places doesn't fully fix
> this problem, because if the pushing/pulling power to the cars isn't
> distributed properly then the couplers "buckle" on turns.


I'd agree.  At 90+ cars, the only way with a single motor was to "pick up" (or,
in american, to "Take Slack").  This is frowned on, since it can jerk out the
couplers on real trains.

James P



Message is in Reply To:
  Longest train, eh? (was: Two Easy Questions about Rolling Stock)
 
(...) cars being pulled along a track. The accompanying text states: "Later a second world record was reached, when the train was prolonged by 18 further yellow tipper waggons. This was definitely the longest pulled Lego®-train ever, maybe even the (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.trains)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR