 | | Re: Train Questions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Yes, I had a few. I think you asked this question (word for word, IIRC) in a different group. Did you read the answers you got there? I did, and I felt that your questions were answered quite well there, in fact. You might give a read to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Train Questions —Adam Wood
|
| | | | (...) group. (...) to (...) folks (...) Indeed I did. And though helpful, I was also told in one of the posts (from Santosh Bhat) to ask here as well. If I had been thinking, it would have been a cross-post to begin with :0P~~~ I was also hoping to (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Train Questions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Fair enough. Probably would have cut down on confusion if you put in a new post referencing the old one and saying you still had questions, rather than repeating the old one (what seemed like) word for word. To the question of "is monorail a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Train Questions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> In case you can't tell which side of the monorail question I was on, put it this way... 'tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. :-) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
