| | Re: Got One of Last Freight Loading Station
|
|
Robin, Yes, 4555 is a great set. The only thing I didn't like was the truck design, so I made it look 100% better (In my humble opinion, anyway!) Have fun building it! Isn't that what Lego sets are all about? :) Scott Sanburn (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
Hay, The TLG has been wrong for years! Long before Town Jr. just look at some of the old S@H catalogs. Robin :) P.S. I like this set(3225) good parts at good price but I think they can do better. (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Got One of Last Freight Loading Station
|
|
Lego Railroaders, I just got my 4555 Freight Loading Station from a friend in Canada. Yes! It was one of the last sets in needed to compete my train collection until the new stuff comes out. Getting this set was tricky, first I tried US S@H but they (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | 182 scans anyone?
|
|
Another plea for scans of 182. I have the head-on image that is the Pause/Lugnet archive. My restoration project can be seen at (URL) I have two big problems right now - figuring out the roof of the passenger cars and figuring out how to attach the (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
Larry! What sacrilege. How could TLG be wrong? If they say it is a caboose, it must be! Just put on your Town Jr. glasses and then make a decision as to what it is. (Just kidding, I know it's a coach) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|