| | Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
|
|
(...) That is great point. However, the tracks would need to be spaced 4 radial studs from each other for the path to remain truly parallel to one another throughout an entire circle, and I'm not sure how wide a monorail train for this single 4.5v (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Dirama and layouts
|
|
Same time ago I unloaded a program whit which it is possible to draw the layouts ; the program it is good, but it is not possible to draw below the layout the space were the rails will be appointed. Nobody know a different system for drawing in a (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
|
|
(...) Or use both and have parallel double curves... (...) No problem, make them spring-(or rubber-band-)loaded. (...) What issues? (...) ...and makes them a rather sorry excuse for a monorail - 2-track wheels on a flat surface an all... (...) Not (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 1999 train availability worldwide
|
|
(...) I would say that Germany would also carry the full range like they have in the past - I think there is a big market for it there. I may be able to get Busy-Bee to import some sets if they think it will sell well, I told them that getting 3225 (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
|
|
Newsgrps: rec.toys.lego To : Frode Torske <Frode.Torske@hydro.com> Attchmnt: Subject : Re: The "fourth" Monorail set (...) handle (...) Hmmm, Mono rail? Mono, meaning one or single.... Maybe you could use *only* one of the two 4.5v radius curves: (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|